Modificări

==Revised Default CopyrightRevizuirea Drepturilor de autor aplicabile=='''Permission is granted to copyCopierea, distribute anddistribuirea si/or modify this sau modificarea acestui document under the terms of se poate face in conditiile stipulate de Licenta tip GNU Free Documentation License as used by sub forma adoptata de Wikipedia andsi/or the sau de Licenta tip Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons License, Version versiunea 2.5 or any later version published; with no Invariant Sectionssau orice alta versiunea recenta publicata, no Front-Cover Textsfara Sectiunile Invariante, and no Back-Cover Textstexte Prima Coperta si Ultima Coperta. Subject to disclaimersPasibile de renuntare.'''

As of November Incepind cu 22, nov 2005, we are tweaking our licensing structure a little bitam ajustat putin structura licentierii noastre. PreviouslyInitial, the default copyright for all drepturile de autor aplicabile tuturor materialelor OrthodoxWiki materials was a se rezumau la Licenta de tip (CC) Creative Commons (CC''n.t. fisiere creative de uz comun'') License ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0]).

There are a couple of problems with this arrangementInsa cu acest aranjament intampinam doua probleme, not least that it in incompatible with cea mai importanta fiind aceea ca este incompatibil cu (and thus violates the terms ofsi astfel incalca prevederile) the Licentei GNU [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License GNU Free Documentation License] (GFDL) used by utilizat de Wikipedia. This causes complications because a number of our articles began as , ceea ce complica lucrurile deoarece mare parte din articolele noastre au fost importuri Wikipedia imports.

Because of Datorita [http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html other concernsalte impedimente], we don’t want to simply adopt the GFDLnu dorim doar sa adoptam pur si simplu licenta GFD.

SoDeci, we are planning to move to a dual licenseintentionam sa abordam licenta dubla. Every edit that is made will be by default licensed under both the Orice editare va fi sub ambele licente GFDL as well as a revised , precum si Licenta Fisierelor Creative Commons license de Uz Comun revizuita. ([http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5]). NaturallyBineinteles, this will not apply to material that was previously released under a different license acestea nu se aplica materialelor publicate anterior sub o alta licenta (unless we have explicit permission otherwisedecat daca avem permisiunea sa o facem), such as the content taken from cum ar fi, de exemplu, continutul preluat din Wikipedia or edits made before November sau editarile datate inainte de 22, nov 2005. This will also not apply to any material that is submitted to De asemenea, acestea nu se aplica nici materialelor primite de OrthodoxWiki under other copyright termssub alte conditii ale dreptului de autor, such as most of our images and some of our articlescum sunt imaginile noastre si unele articole. '''If you would like to apply this license retroactively to include all of your editsDaca doriti sa aplicati aceasta licenta retroactiv pentru toate editarile dumneavoastra, please add the va rog sa adaugati la pagina de utilizator tiparul [[Template:Acceptrevised|acceptrevised]] template to your user page.''' (You can do this simply by adding O puteti face simplu prin adaugarea "<nowiki>{{acceptrevised}}</nowiki>" to your pagela pagina de utilizator.)

The main change as far as the Schimbarea cea mai importanta in ceea ce priveste licenta Creative Commons license is concerned, is that the new license allows restricted commercial use of the materialconsta in faptul ca noua licenta permite utilizarea comerciala restrictiva a materialelor. The GFDL already allows thisLicenta GFD permite si ea aceste lucruri, and we see no reason to make the deci nu vedem necesitatea transformarii licentei CC license more restrictiveintr-una mult mai restrictiva. FurthermoreMai mult, we do not anticipate anybody making big money off of nu credem ca ar face cineva avere de pe urma continutului OrthodoxWiki content. If someone can earn something by publishing it commercially according to the terms of one of these licensesChiar daca cineva ar obtine un profit din publicarea continutului in scop comercial, we will simply be happy that the content is being used and that OrthodoxWiki is being publicizedin conditiile acestor licente, ne-ar bucura pur si simplu faptul ca se face cunoscut continutul site-ului nostru. FurthermorePe langa asta, we are still requiring authors of este nevoie de autori pentru lucrari derivative works to de "Share-Alike", which means they cannot restrict similar copying of the edits they make from ceea ce inseamna ca ei nu pot restrictiona copieri similare ale publicatiilor pe care le fac dupa articolele OrthodoxWiki articles.

We would also like to make sure that the barriers to reprinting material here are not too highMai vrem sa ne asiguram ca barierele de reprintare a materialelor nu sunt prea mari aici. Right nowIn acest moment, to be safepentru siguranta, reprintarea materialelor necesita contactarea tuturor colaboratorilor individuali si obtinerea permisiunii fiecaruia dintre ei pentru folosirea materialelor, precum si mentionarea lor ca autori, reprinting material requires contacting all of the individual contributors and obtaining their permission to use their materials and crediting them individually. We'd like to change it so that consent is implied and the requirement for attribution can be fullfilled more simplyAm dori sa schimbam procedura, astfel incat acceptul sa fie subinteles si conditiile de atribuire sa se simplifice.

Here's an imagined scenarioImaginati-va un scenariu ca acesta: A number of people dedicate their time and know-how to create a splendid series of articles on Orthodox monasticism in South Un numar de oameni isi aloca timp si tehnica pentru compilarea unei serii splendide de articole despre monasticismul ortodox din Africade Sud. A priest in Un preot din Zimbabwe wants to reprint these articles for the edification of the faithfuleste interesat sa ia aceste articole si sa le prezinte credinciosilor sai. NowDeci, instead of getting permission from or citing every single contributorin loc sa obtina permisiunea si sa citeze pe fiecare din colaboratori, this priest can simply cite collective authorship at acest preot poate foarte simplu cita colectivul de autori ai OrthodoxWiki, and refer to the si sa faca referire la licenta[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ CC by-sa] license. AlsoDe asemenea, he doesn't have to be shy about trying to recoup his printing costs, or even earning el poate incerca sa-si recupereze costurile de printare si chiar sa obtina un mic castig pentru a small profit to help reward him for him time and effortcompensa timpul si efortul depus. If he wants to polish up the articles, and add some Daca mai vrea sa aranjeze putin textele si sa le adauge un iz local flavor, he is free to do soo poate face, but his revision must likewise by published under the same licensedar sub aceeasi licenta. This wayAstfel, others can benefit from his work just as he benefitted from those before himsi altii vor putea beneficia de munca lui, asa cum a facut-o si el inainte.

To this endIn acest scop, the functia “click-through language’’ (what is agreed to everytime a user clicks “Save Page�care se cere ori de cate ori utilizatorul acceseaza functia “Salveaza pagina�? in an edit boxintr-un spatiu de editare) will be revised to say thatva fi revizuita astfel incat sa spuna ca, unless explicitly stated otherwisein lipsa altor specificatii, the author of the edits is granting to autorul editarilor ofera OrthodoxWiki and its operator(s) the perpetual and royalty-free right to make use ofsi operatorilor sai dreptul nelimitat si gratuit de a folosi, reformatreformata, republishrepublica, changeschimba, editedita, etc., the content of the contributed work continutul materialului obtinut prin colaborare, in any form or mediumorice forma sau imprejurare, and that further permission need not be sought from the contributor to make such fara a mai fi nevoie de permisiunea colaboratorului pentru aceste procedee derivative uses of the contributed workale materialelor sale, and that all requirements for attribution are met by citing collective authorship at iar conditiile de atribuire vor fi indeplinite prin citarea calitatii de autor colectiv al OrthodoxWiki and a reference to the , cu trimitere la site-ul OrthodoxWiki site (OrthodoxWiki.org), which will contain this copyright information as well as the edit history of each articlecare va contine aceste informatii despre dreptul de autor, with links to each user’s page containing however much or little information they precum si istoricul editarii fiecarui articol, cu link-uri catre fiecare pagina de utilizator care ar contine o cat de mica informatie pe care to submitar dori sa o transmita.

This is lawyerAceasta este varianta "avocatiala" pentru protectia noastra. Nimeni nu-speak for our protection. No one can claim any author’s work as their own and authors remain free to resi poate asuma dreptul de autor asupra unui material care nu-i apartine, iar autorii sunt liberi sa-issue their own work under any other license they choosesi republice munca sub orice alta licenta ar prefera.

We are trying to be as conscientious as possible about copyright concernsNoi incercam sa fim cat mai realisti in ce priveste drepturile de autor si sa prevenim incalcarea lor. It is our policy to be proactive about copyright infringement. HoweverCu toate acestea, if you think you have seen any type of copyright infringementdaca ati observat orice fel de incalcare a acestor drepturi, please give us the benefit of the doubt and contact us so that we can clear up any issuesva rog sa ne acordati prezumtia de nevinovatie si sa ne contactati ca sa putem clarifica lucrurile. Please also let us know if you have any other comments or concernsVa rugam sa ne informati si daca aveti alte comentarii sau nelamuriri.